“When the creek changes east or west, my boundary line would change so that it’s in the middle of the current path of the creek.”
And the MOST important thing, is that you, and the people out west, still have access to the water. Although not sure how that works if it only extends to the brush line? Perhaps there is another river nearby to the south to provide for the Texans.
If it was me, and the feds wanted to get the land between me and my backyard neighbor (the jerk!), I’m pretty sure that we would BOTH figure something out between ourselves to keep the feds out of our backyards. (Hey - I’m a “NIMBY”!)
Perhaps there is another river nearby to the south to provide for the Texans.
**************************
I have no idea what that means.
The Red River is a “border” river. It begins at the Eastern base of the TX Panhandle, separating OK, small portion of SW AR and then forms the Western LA border before it empties into the Gulf of MX just East of Port Arthur TX.
The subject of the thread is the land grab more than access to water, although water is very important to the ranchers and farmers.
Well, I am sure that there is a due process, for the government to take it. My neighbor happens to be the State of Missouri. Their property on the East is a narrow strip of land that is the right of way for a state highway.
USA keeps trying to redefine stuff to give Fedzilla control of all internal water ways. I am not sure how long that type of stuff can be defeated, since the Government seems to have early onset dementia.