And once again, what difference does it make? Until Bundy's ill advised comments, things were going along basically fine there from a political perspective. Though he wasn't a perfect figurehead, the BLM backed off and it seemed the bigger picture arguments of federal landgrabs might spring from this. What comments I made were primarily focused on other issues (mostly Ukraine).
You ARE a conspiracy theorist. I saw you making the same exact dopey charges against someone else with whom you disagreed. The idea that you have to comment on something from the outset to have any input in it as the story develops is just idiotic.
You continue to add nothing to the debate except paranoia.
Ill advised? Ya think he's a professional spokesperson? A public speaker? A seasoned big city mouth who knows all the politically correct terms to use? Or is he just a rancher in rural America who spoke basic words?
BTW, I don't think anything he said was racist, you however have suggested he's an idiot, a moron and possibly a hater and racist.
Nice..
What is a conspiracy theorist? Would that be someone who does not trust government? Is it someone who claimed the U.S. government illegally turned it's massive spy machine on law abiding US citizens, while the same government aids and abets an epic illegal invasion of our country while demanding legitimate citizens obey all laws?