Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem; narses; Nachum; SunkenCiv; Alberta's Child

No.

If your scenario were to happen (that of NY having to switch from communistic (er socialist) to republican BECAUSE of this inter-state agreement, then NY would simply refuse to follow the NPV agreement!

However, if OH were to vote “red” in the election, but PA and IL and NY voted “blue” then MA, PA, NY, IL and CA WOULD combine to “force” / “bribe” / “influence” Ohio’s electors to vote BLUE because of this agreement!

The socialist/communists ONLY follow “agreements” and “the law” WHEN IT AGREES WITH THEIR NEEDS!


40 posted on 05/17/2014 7:48:01 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

That points to a bigger problem with these multi-state NPV agreements. They are probably unenforceable. If one state decides to unilaterally violate the terms of the agreement, then I don’t see what kind of recourse another state might have to enforce it.


42 posted on 05/17/2014 8:01:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson