Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neel Kashkari Takes California Republican Governors Race
Dignitas News Service ^ | June 4, 2014 | Dignitas News Team

Posted on 06/04/2014 4:23:14 AM PDT by dignitasnews

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Forward the Light Brigade

He

- Voted for Obama in 2008
- Is pro-Abortion
- Is pro-Amnesty
- Is soft on 2nd Amendment
- Was the guy who doled out the cash for the TARP bailout (thus, “Kash Karry”)

Sorry. Held my nose and voted for a Rat in Cat’s clothing too many times. Brown’s gonna win, I’m gonna write in Mickey Mouse.


21 posted on 06/04/2014 11:08:28 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

I do not recall seeing ONE Tim Donnelly commercial or hearing ONE Tim Donnelly commercial on the Radio, not one.

It’s a wonder that he got as many Votes as he did.

Brown will win in a Landslide, no doubt. Even if we cloned Reagan and he was running against Brown, it wouldn’t make a difference.


22 posted on 06/04/2014 11:26:44 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (If Cancer were Contagious, they would call it Liberalism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dignitasnews

Kashkari will fail to get my vote in the general. He’s a Romney guy. He can pound sand.


23 posted on 06/04/2014 11:59:44 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
I do not recall seeing ONE Tim Donnelly commercial or hearing ONE Tim Donnelly commercial on the Radio, not one

All true, that's part of my point: his was a real grassroots TEA party kind of candidacy. He had very little money, appealing to the Guns and Bibles Clingers of the "Republican" Party...in other words, us.

And what did the Big Money guys do to him? Did they help?

Nah. They rat screwed him.

We can't replace the upper echelon of the Stupid Party fast enough.

24 posted on 06/04/2014 12:06:12 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade; JRandomFreeper; All
All we can do now is vote for Neel—and pray he wins over the Teacher’s Union man—Brown.?

What you mean "we," White Man?

I voted for Republican Meg Whitman, a fully functional leftist on all fronts, as a means to vote "against" Brown. Then after reading here for the umpteenth time J Random Freeper's pearl of pure in-your-face truth that "If you vote for liberals you're liberal," the light bulb finally went on. (Johnny, thank you for your persistence in posting that simple truth over the years, and may you continue for many more years to come).

If she'd won, would I be accountable for the functional leftism I'd voted FOR? As she advanced all the leftist crap, but in a more businesslike button-down "conservative" manner, that Brown advances? Which she would have; I did my due diligence on her, and voted for her anyway, which was stupid of me. One has to be stupid to be a liberal, and voting for Meg Whitman made me a functional liberal, though my intentions were (foolishly) the opposite.

And it will be stupid of you to vote for Kashkari because your vote will be to expand leftism. You can pretend all you want that your vote will be to prevent the Teachers' Unions, just as I used to pretend that my vote for Whitman, and my vote for Schwarzenegger, were votes "against" Brown and Bustamonte.

The reality is that the only thing that matters is what you vote for. When you vote for Kashkari in the general, you will only be voting FOR making leftism and liberalism more powerful in the Republican party. Period.

25 posted on 06/04/2014 12:18:37 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

You know women better than most people.


26 posted on 06/04/2014 12:21:38 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dignitasnews

too bad Kneel, Cash N Carry won the primary


27 posted on 06/04/2014 12:29:11 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

Running candidates that piss off 40% of your own party is not a winning strategy for November.

He doesn’t deserve to win. I will happy to see him lose.


28 posted on 06/04/2014 12:31:15 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Well, then why can’t you get 60% of the party to support your candidate.

I’ve never heard such whining in politics as the losers who think everyone else is out of step but them.

I bet you guys took the ball and went home when the team didn’t want you to play quarterback.


29 posted on 06/04/2014 3:51:57 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

I’m not a Republican, at this point I hardly care which party wins.


30 posted on 06/04/2014 4:51:07 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wildbill; GeronL; All
I bet you guys took the ball and went home when the team didn’t want you to play quarterback.

Bill, that's a stupid, shallow, and false analogy.

When you're playing football, you're doing it because you love to play football and competitiveness drives the need to "win," even though whether Team A or Team B wins is of zero importance in the real world. In fact, because it is of zero real importance, is why things like football provide such a popular outlet for people.

When you're engaged in supporting a political candidate, whether a leftist or a limited government conservative wins makes a profound difference in the real world.

Some of us refuse to support Republican leftists because we understand that truth. Some of you consider such refusal as the equivalent of "taking our ball and going home because the team doesn't want us to play quarterback." If you insist on a sports analogy, use one that is more accurate: it's more like leaving when moron players want to use our ball to play a dangerous nightmare game.

31 posted on 06/04/2014 7:30:08 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

+1


32 posted on 06/07/2014 12:25:32 AM PDT by Pelham (If you do not deport it is amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Just remember, Sandra Fluke rhymes with.


33 posted on 06/07/2014 12:30:25 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; John Semmens; AuH2ORepublican

Um

http://politic365.com/2014/08/01/california-gubernatorial-candidate-pretends-to-be-homeless-with-a-camera-crew/

What dafuq?


34 posted on 08/03/2014 11:47:44 PM PDT by Impy (Think for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson