The gov't has more important safety issues, like making cheese on wood boards.
1 posted on
06/13/2014 11:11:49 AM PDT by
Rusty0604
To: Rusty0604
GMO also have the advantage of charging the small farmers outrageous fees for seed corn, etc....
how can it be that in the best country in the world, the once leader of the free market, can have almost all of its crops beholden to one monstrous company?
2 posted on
06/13/2014 11:15:31 AM PDT by
cherry
To: Rusty0604
Oh noes, scary technology.
4 posted on
06/13/2014 11:17:15 AM PDT by
wideawake
To: Rusty0604
Nearly all of them benefit agribusiness rather than, say, you. Extended shelf life is a biggie — semi-immortal tomatoes reduce spoilageReduced spoilage doesn't benefit me?
6 posted on
06/13/2014 11:22:09 AM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Rusty0604
I’ll stick with my non-engineered stuff, fencing, mulch and the natural insecticides a poster already mentioned. I’m really not into chemicals for human consumption...
8 posted on
06/13/2014 11:25:37 AM PDT by
Texan5
("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
To: Rusty0604
“In 1995, American agriculture underwent a profound, dangerous change.”
What exactly is so dangerous? Not your “feelings” about GM foods, mind you, I am asking for actual, documented dangers.
To: Rusty0604
22 posted on
06/13/2014 11:44:02 AM PDT by
dalereed
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson