Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2014 5:05:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wait til Adam tells Eve that one.

They’ll have a good laugh at the judge’s expense.


2 posted on 06/14/2014 5:08:29 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is this the same Jon Huntsman Sr. who has a son (JR.) that ran for president. The same Huntsmans who are distantly related to Mitt, but cannot stand him? That Jon Huntsman Sr.?
If so, I can accept that he, as a Mormon, would believe this to be true. Even though the religion officially disowned polygamy now, it has not been so very long that this was their natural status of righteous living.


3 posted on 06/14/2014 5:11:42 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Throughout history, the most 'traditional' form of marriage has not been between one man and one woman, but between one man and multiple women, which presumably is not a tradition that defendants and amici would like to continue."

I fail to see how that statement bolsters her 'rationale' for redefining marriage anyway.

4 posted on 06/14/2014 5:17:34 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What bosh. When even a few men can afford multiple wives, the ordinary man gets one, and a lot get none.

(See the “modern” Islamic world.)


6 posted on 06/14/2014 5:19:19 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I have a classic sports car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wonder if it is actually true. I know polygamy was existed in ancient times, but always assumed that like homosexuality it was something limited to the upper class. I cannot imagine that the average subsistence farmer in Europe/Asia feudal society or hunter gatherers in Africa/America’s could afford the luxury of a second wife. Even in the Muslim world, far as I know it was strictly something rich people do. I guess a society where man are routinely butchered in combat could be pressured to adopt this.


8 posted on 06/14/2014 5:32:43 PM PDT by BurningOak (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Judge is going to burn in hell


12 posted on 06/14/2014 5:45:35 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“that plural marriage is actually more traditional over time.”

Ah-huh. Assuming that is the case, how many of those traditional-over-time societies allowed for plural -same sex- marriages?

*crickets chirp*


19 posted on 06/14/2014 7:19:03 PM PDT by DemforBush (A repo man is always intense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson