Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/19/2014 9:12:40 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldpuppymax

I wish the article had offered whatever were Marshall’s arguments for why, in his opinion, “section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had empowered the Court to issue writs of mandamus in such cases, but that this was in violation of the Constitution”.

From THAT Marshall’s SCOTUS found it lacked the authority to force Jeffereson to issue the commissions, but what was THAT Constitutional argument of Marshall’s regarding section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789?????

Anyone?


2 posted on 07/19/2014 10:11:21 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

Like him or not, Marshall was a genius. He decided this case such that there was nothing that Jefferson or anyone else could do about it.


10 posted on 07/19/2014 10:57:31 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson