Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
At the time the Constitution was written, the economy of the southern states was totally largely reliant on slave labor.

Buy that?

At the time, I believe the most important single crop in the south was indigo -- concentrated in South Carolina and grown in the hot, humid coastal plain.

Very labor intensive -- moreso even than cotton.

Frankly, I don't know why we're still quibbling on this topic. On the one hand, it seems obvious that "totally" was an overstatement and thus inaccurate. And, by the same token, it seems obvious that -- even in the 1790's -- the economy of the south (defined as Virginia thru Georgia) was largely (mainly, importantly, strongly) reliant on slave labor.

Indeed, the best proof of that claim may be that the southern states were prepared to depart the Confederation over it. And they were doubtless the best judges of just how reliant their economy was on that "peculiar institution" at the time.

68 posted on 07/27/2014 10:35:59 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: okie01
At the time, I believe the most important single crop in the south was indigo -- concentrated in South Carolina and grown in the hot, humid coastal plain.

The most important (and first) commercial crop in the south up until the revolution was tobacco, concentrated in Virginia, Maryland and NC. The link in #67 addresses that.

72 posted on 07/27/2014 12:00:52 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson