Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

From the article is sounds like they bumped up their pensions just before filing bankruptcy.

It sounds like the judge undid that.

It is normal in a bankruptcy for the court to go back and look at the last nine months activity prior to filing for bankruptcy and reverse anything that significantly compromised creditors position once bankruptcy was filed.

The union might have lost this ruling but it does not appear to be a gutting of pensions as the headline implies.

Maybe a FReeper on her with bankruptcy expertise can verify my take.


9 posted on 10/04/2014 11:39:46 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gunsequalfreedom
Franklin argued that an exit plan that provides full payment of the city’s “massive” pension liability, while paying Franklin a penny on the dollar, cannot be confirmed under the federal bankruptcy code requiring fair treatment of creditors.

The way I read it, is that the ruling is only that the pension can be adjusted...and not what the adjustment will be..

Not a atty, but I once stayed in a Holiday Inn Express...

11 posted on 10/04/2014 11:46:06 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Have you reached your breaking point yet? If not now....then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson