Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

A District lawyer argued, in part, that the second amendment just guarantees the right to own a gun, not to carry that gun in public.


That is a crack up. “Bear arms” relates to the latter point more than the former. If you can’t carry a gun in public, it’s preatty hard to “bear” the gun.

Gawd these people think we are stupid.


2 posted on 10/21/2014 6:53:34 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

I’d actually go further. The right to “bear” arms doesn’t simply mean the right to march in formation while spinning a rifle around with fancy moves.

You’re actually allowed to fire the damned thing.


3 posted on 10/21/2014 7:09:00 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson