To: SeekAndFind
The information missing from this story is why Mr Anderson had the $ in his car.
The “why” is missing.
The “who”, “what”, “when”, and “where” have been covered.
Any time one of those cardinal rules of journalism are either omitted or ignored, is when the alarm bells should be going off...
Why is the “why” coverage missing???!!!????
5 posted on
11/01/2014 6:32:33 PM PDT by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2001)
To: WildHighlander57
WHY ... ... does he need to justify his possession of US currency?
8 posted on
11/01/2014 6:35:24 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
To: WildHighlander57
How is the “why” relevant?
The 5th amendment protects him from having to answer that question.
9 posted on
11/01/2014 6:36:14 PM PDT by
Tea Party Terrorist
(Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
To: WildHighlander57
....nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...
10 posted on
11/01/2014 6:37:40 PM PDT by
Tea Party Terrorist
(Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
To: WildHighlander57
What do you mean the “why” is missing? What business is it of yours? Its not a crime to have cash in your possession. The “why” is irrelevant.
To: WildHighlander57
He shouldn’t need a “reason” to carry his own money, but he is a dumb-arse for not hiding it better!
58 posted on
11/01/2014 8:32:07 PM PDT by
Minutemen
("It's a Religion of Peace")
To: WildHighlander57
Why is the “why” coverage missing???!!!???? "Why" is not in the purview of journalism. It requires going beyond the facts, which are who, what, when, where, and how. "Why" is wide open to conjecture and interpretation and opinion. This is "why" journalists have taken the word "why" as part of their mission.
66 posted on
11/01/2014 10:38:19 PM PDT by
webheart
(We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
To: WildHighlander57
The information missing from this story is why Mr Anderson had the $ in his car. The “why” is missing. The “who”, “what”, “when”, and “where” have been covered. Any time one of those cardinal rules of journalism are either omitted or ignored, is when the alarm bells should be going off... Why is the “why” coverage missing???!!!????And it has to be illegal for a cop to tell someone that if he can abscond with the cash, the citizen won't be charged with a crime - while threatening a criminal charge if the citizen isn't good with it...smell::rotten::Denmark::this story
70 posted on
11/02/2014 2:48:37 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson