Skip to comments.
Limbaugh: GOP has 'incredible' mandate
The Hill ^
| November 5, 2014
| Jesse Byrnes
Posted on 11/05/2014 10:27:23 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Now Rush is talking up WI Gov. Scott Walker - a real conservative star. The Left has thrown every thing at Scott Walker and he's still standing, still winning, still smiling.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Pubbies should tell the Marxists,”We won, live with it!”
2
posted on
11/05/2014 10:30:55 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'll personally save the word "mandate" for a time in which we do this well during a Presidential election year. This clearly helps (especially at the state level), but it will be interesting to see how this Congress plays their hand, for it's not like Obama will roll over.
3
posted on
11/05/2014 10:32:46 AM PST
by
alancarp
To: Cincinatus' Wife
While I’m a Cruz fan, I now feel Walker is our best bet for 2016.
4
posted on
11/05/2014 10:36:18 AM PST
by
BlueStateRightist
(Government is best which governs least.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The stoopid party will do nothing. They can’t help themselves.
5
posted on
11/05/2014 10:38:07 AM PST
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: alancarp
If not a mandate, “strong permission”.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Incredible. As in “they have no credibility whatsoever to carry it out”.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Walker 2016. He fights, he governs, he wins. No republican has a better resume.
To: Col Frank Slade
9
posted on
11/05/2014 10:43:05 AM PST
by
alancarp
To: Cincinatus' Wife; All
But how do you get anything done with Obama still able to wield a veto pen? You can pass bill after bill that he’ll veto. What does he care? He’s pretty much done, and too arrogant to agree to anything he doesn’t like.
So is the answer “Pass tons of bills that Obama will veto, with no progress on any major issues for the next 2 years while Obama issues executive order after executive order”?
To: VRWC For Truth
McConnell is already talking about his duty to work with democrats. Ya right, like Harry Ried? < p> someone tell Mitch we don’t agree with Dems on anything
To: Cincinatus' Wife
There are a few things I do not like about Scott Walker.
didn’t he recently refuse to appeal on gay marriage?
didn’t he tell conservatives to shut up about “social issues”?
didn’t he tell conservatives/TEA Partiers not to run candidates in primaries against GOP leaders?
12
posted on
11/05/2014 10:45:56 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: BlueStateRightist
I like Cruz, but being a senator is not good for presidential experience. Senators are preening peacocks, governors govern states. President Walker can nominate Cruz for the supreme court.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Limbaugh: GOP has 'incredible' mandate Correct. And to prevent them from destorying any chance in 2016, they need competent leadership, which means Boehner and McConnell must go.
14
posted on
11/05/2014 10:48:02 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Are we really going to allow a kenyan bastard to take down OUR great Country?)
To: precisionshootist
Mitch agrees with the Dems on a lot of things.
The RINO-Dem coalition dominates the Senate
15
posted on
11/05/2014 10:48:53 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: GeronL
Walker is another Shamnesty pimp. No thanks.
16
posted on
11/05/2014 10:49:02 AM PST
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Here comes Immigration Reform.
17
posted on
11/05/2014 11:00:05 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: GeronL
There are a few things I do not like about Scott Walker. didnt he recently refuse to appeal on gay marriage? didnt he tell conservatives to shut up about social issues? didnt he tell conservatives/TEA Partiers not to run candidates in primaries against GOP leaders?OK, the 2014 elections are over, Its now time for the conservatives to divide on all the potential conservative candidates so that we can get another McCain or Romney instead. I think I will wait until they 1. Announce 2. Get some campaigning under their belt 3. Debate. At that time I will pick my guy and will not bash anyone who might be better than somebody picked by GOPe.
18
posted on
11/05/2014 11:01:41 AM PST
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: GeronL
didnt he tell conservatives to shut up about social issues?
Not sure about your other two questions, but I thought Mitch Daniels said this.
To: needmorePaine
maybe I’m mistaken on that one
20
posted on
11/05/2014 11:10:04 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson