Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2015 10:07:13 AM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish

But not crimes against humanity!


2 posted on 01/02/2015 10:11:25 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

This same argument is made in the book “Freakonomics”, that crime rates fell in the 1990s because abortion eliminated unwanted children, especially among the poor.


3 posted on 01/02/2015 10:14:03 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Queue up any number of the “that’s racist” GIFs!


4 posted on 01/02/2015 10:21:32 AM PST by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

For the sake of argument let’s accept his premise which boils down to abortion reduces crime, so abortion is good.

I would venture to guess that killing most black infant boys in single parent households would also reduce crime (since that’s who commits most crimes), so would that also be a good public policy?


5 posted on 01/02/2015 10:26:01 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Abortion is a crime, it doesn’t matter how much money the parents have or what color they are.


6 posted on 01/02/2015 10:26:24 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

That was one of Maggie Sanger’s reasons for her eugenics program.


7 posted on 01/02/2015 10:36:22 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (quod est Latine morositate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

It probably does.

That is hardly a reason to justify murdering people ten, fifteen, twenty years before they commit crimes. Before they take their first breath.

Also assumes their crime is so awful it negates any potential relative good their other actions as a person, don’t matter.

It’s an idiotic concept. With this logic they could just shoot innocent people and say in the future it’s likely they WOULD have committed crimes if we let them live. And since libtards are defining what crimes are, if you are an unapologetic white Christian, they’ll just off you now, ten, fifteen years before they say you’d do anything illegal.

Idiotic. Gruber’s the kind of person that when he says these kinds of idiotic statements, you immediately apply their idiotic logic statement to them, right there. As a warning to others.


9 posted on 01/02/2015 11:52:08 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Shows Gruber’s inner racist poking through. Since abortion kills many blacks, and blacks are inherently criminal, abortion reduces crime! < /libthink >


10 posted on 01/02/2015 11:53:58 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

“Abortion was at best a minor factor in the reduction of inner city crime.”

Actually there was a massive crime wave in inner cities during the 90’s. This came about 15 plus years after a massive wave of welfare payments made to unwed mothers who during 70’s as a reward for cranking out babies.

So there was a big drop in teenage crime during the late 90’s. But this was mainly the result of the passing of a bumper crop of illegitimate inner city kids born in the late 70s, rather than any reduction due to abortions.


13 posted on 01/02/2015 12:40:32 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson