Obama wants to change the tax code to punish families with a stay-at-home parent

wordpress ^ | January 18, 2015 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

[grundle]

My title is a lot more accurate than the title from the original article, which is another reason for making the blog post and posting it here.

[humblegunner]

You could have posted it in News if you had omitted your blog’s involvement.

Wider exposure.

[ibheath]

Funny thing, when I looked at the post, I thought "Good, he posted the whole thing, there shouldn't be any blogpimp bitching from humblegunner." Then I scroll down and find you bitching about the fact that he did.

First you bitch when bloggers excerpt their blogs, now you are going to bitch when they do? You need a new hobby.

[humblegunner]

Then I scroll down and find you bitching about the fact that he did.

Not exactly. I don't see any criticism of his posting the full content.

Fact is he openly admits where he got the story. ("Got" meaning "stole".)

I question his blog's role in this.. which is none.

If you wish to honor theft, that is your business.

[what's up]

Obama knows this won't pass. It's all about changing the subject so the feckless Republicans won't get around to passing anything Obama would have to veto.

They are going to at least pass Keystone and Iran Sanctions no doubt about it. Votes are in the bag.

I think what this is more about is going ahead with a string of proposals in advance of tax season; Obamacare regs for taxes are going to be VERY unpopular.

[kiryandil]

Geez, I read your blog all the time. Good stuff.

[kiryandil]

Arguing with the mumblegummer is a waste of time. LOL! :)

[Organic Panic]

What about the no working print families? It’s not fair that a non working non taxpaying welfare queen won’t get this “credit”

[kalee]

For later reading