Guilty or not-guilty?
i like her. She’s funny and smart.
May I inquire as to whether she would be willing to oppress me?
(Oh press me! Again! Again!)
I’m voting for cute satire. It is actually pretty comical and explains why men are stuck in a ‘damned if you do’ and ‘damned if you don’t’ trap in regards to our relations with women.
I would guess generally not guilty, and without clicking on the link, I think is is pretty funny satire so far!
Broplimenting...gotta love it!
There are many man-haters out there for whom this article is gospel.
Love the pic.
She’s got that “I’m smarter than the sum of the progressive dork-O-nauts out there” look.
And she’s right. (In so many ways.)
Over the weekend a big Grizzly-Adams type guy smiled and me and said, “You really have some pretty hair.”
I should have screamed, “You SOB!”
;)
She’s on Red Eye on occasion - she’s awesome.
Oh, and then there's "pig-norance." That's when men fail to notice the extraordinary lengths women go to to look nice. Men are so narcissistic that they overlook the $100 manicure and the kelp-ostrich egg shampoo imported from Micronesia, plus that cute bob you just spent half a month's salary on. Pigs!
Funny! :-)
With a face like that, you know she’s bringing the sarcasm.
Seriously? Treat us the same! Its not like were easily offended or anything! That should settle the question of satire.
I think she’s totally cute (of course, I married a blonde who is cuter!) - here’s one of her video reports interviewing Sn. Cruz:
http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=4799
No Guilty!
Hilarious! She has the liberal-speak down.
Feh ... If that was published in S@l0n dot com, instead of National Review, we'd all assume it was meant to be taken seriously.
I would be guilty of urinating while standing up if some sow had her arm in a barrel of cement blocking me on my morning commute. I can think of many purposeful things I do to annoy the obvious feminist.