Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rawcatslyentist

The evidence that Obama was born in HI is highly questionable. Had he actually been born there, ***someone*** would remember something. A landlady would recall his mother, or the landlady’s child/children would. A neighbor would remember. A friend. People remember Stanley Ann from before her pregnancy. People recall her afterward. There is just one 9-mo gap during which she appears to have vaporized.

Stanley Ann’s whereabouts during that period are a matter of debate, but you can virtually rule out HI. A person cannot live for 9-mos in a place, showing a pregnancy more each day, and finally going to the hospital and bringing home a newborn, without ***someone*** noticing. But in Stanley Ann’s case not one soul remembers her in HI. I.e.: they recall her before this period and after, but not during.

Let’s face it, she wasn’t there.


84 posted on 01/22/2015 3:53:55 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter
Maybe. Maybe all the mistakes in records were scar tissue from hiding he was born there to an Indonesian father.

The African parentage ploy is being used to manipulate a tenth of our population. That is a fact.

How many American Negroes would blindly follow an Indonesian? 0%?

That IS a damning MOTIVE for hiding his parentage!

The Subud cult has 3 main bases of operations. Jakarta, Honolulu, and Chicago. The Stanleys were members, so was Fuddy!

85 posted on 01/22/2015 4:10:05 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson