OK, so I had to bug out before Rush finished his point,
but I assumed his conclusion, and it was BRILLIANT.
Don’t refuse to make a homo “wedding” cake on the basis of your own faith,
but refuse to make it because it’s offensive to Muslims.
I’m really tempted to try this line of reasoning on a libinlaw just to watch her spin.
I like the idea of using the “it’s offensive to Muslims” argument when it comes to not agreeing to do something for most ANYTHING that liberals have taken up as a favored cause.
Don’t just limit it to the Homosexual First agenda, use it on female “rights” to abortion or any form of free expression of femininity, on declarations that ALL religions are essentially superstitions, and on the definition of “free speech” as essentially limited to “free APPROVED speech”.