Posted on 06/14/2015 9:17:28 PM PDT by lbryce
Michael Savage makes an example of Emma Goldman, the anarchist that was deported back to Russia, giving her a front row seat as her beloved communism took hold in the Bolshevik Revolution. That experience caused her to change her opinion, but the point Savage is making is that we need to return to that type of solution, the elimination of the anti-American problem in our midst.
Savage says if he were president hed bring back HUAC, the House Un-American Activities Committee, which was formed in 1938 to investigate domestic enemies, their sponsors and their activities. It was disbanded in 1975 but in view of our current mess, Savage thinks it is needed again, perhaps more than ever. He recommends that it be staffed with returning veterans who have demonstrated their love for America.
He says he would deport anyone who is working against the interests of America and provides some examples, including the anti-American ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
(Excerpt) Read more at rickwells.us ...
If I wanted to listen to liberal talking points, then Id put liberals on. And there is nothing he is correct on with respect to the Founding Fathers that I can see, unless someone can actually put the disrespectful slave-owning demagogues (which I heard with my own ears, and which matches one of the goals of Communists for USA in the Congressional record just too closely) in a conservative context that I do not see existing anywhere.
I'm sure Michael understands if the HUAC ever got re-enacted and the liberals/progressive got control of Congress...
He would be one of the first to be indicted...
HUAC is a very bad idea...
That said, he can be a bit hard to take when he "digresses".
Agreed!
Left must be hard if everyone must agree with you 100%.
I like your explanation. It’s a clever ploy playing devil’s advocate in order to bring out the truth, worst in people.
I absolutely cannot stand this man when he psychotically rants and raves about how great he is, about his numbers, and slanders his competitors who are much better than he is anyway. I especially hate when he talks about himself in the third person, and how he is wonderful, and how he is an instrument of God, and so on. The secret is that he is not capable of holding a single topic together for more than a short span, and then he has two trip off onto recipes, heartburn, and his dog Teddy.
The secret is that he is not capable of holding a single topic together for more than a short span, and then he has to trip off onto recipes, heartburn, and his dog Teddy
Here’s the so-called secret recipe: pick a topic and yell about it.
I learned nothing from this man. Nothing; everything he says comes from Drudge. And while I do try to listen to him, I always end up turning him off.Here’s the so-called secret recipe: pick a topic and yell about it. I learned nothing from this man. Nothing, and while I try to listen to him, I always end up turning him off
I’m a jew. What would you do against me?
He’s a lunatic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.