Move to Germany with a student visa by using the step by step virtual assistant to the German student visa or reading about visa for international student in Germany.
READ MORE HERE:
http://www.economist.com/node/18898286
German universities: Mediocre, but at least they’re free
One by one, German states are scrapping university tuition fees
Free partying!!!
Forget about saving for tuition
buy your kid a black market Syrian passport and send them to Germany
Free housing, free food, free transportation, free shoplifting, welfare allowance to buy what you can’t steal, free healthcare and full tuition
I have a friend in Sweden, a doctor, and her income tax is 64% of her salary. I almost passed out in shock. She accepts it, as do the rest of the Swedes. They give cradle to grave care for EVERYONE.
Socialism is political lobotomy.
“Free” for some.
Germany pre-selects students who are capable of doing college level work. Those not capable are tracked to vocational hands-on apprentice programs etc.
I don’t much about German undergraduate colleges but the sons and daughters of several of my friends are working on MS degrees in engineering at two German Universities.
My friends who are engineers tell me that the graduate programs are first rate. The kids are pretty smart. They are attending graduate programs that are taught completely in German.
The writer was doing fine until her ignorance burned through at the end.
Many of the graduate programs, and an increasing number of undergraduate classes, are taught in English.
For a couple of examples, see the University of Constance here:
http://www.international.uni-konstanz.de/en/international-students/study-opportunities/courses-taught-in-english/
or Regensburg
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/ur-international/english-taught-degree-courses/english-taught-master-degree-courses/index.html
In short, German is useful, but in many cases not necessary for a degree, particularly in technology and science.
The great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphasis added]. - Thomas Jefferson: 6th Annual Message, 1806.
The rich alone use imported articles, and on these alone the whole taxes of the General Government are levied [emphasis added]. . . . Our revenues liberated by the discharge of the public debt, and its surplus applied to canals, roads, schools, etc., the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings [emphasis added]. - Thomas Jefferson to Thaddeus Kosciusko, 1811.
And consider that if the USA federal government was actually respecting prohibitions on taxing and spending as clarified by a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices, that the states could consider amending the Constitution to give the feds the constitutional authority to tax and spend for free schooling like Jefferson had envisioned.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
In the meanwhile, state lawmakers need to wise up to the federal governments illegal taxes and put a stop to it. If the states did so then the states would be able to raise the revenues to provide free schooling, depending on what a given states legal majority voters are willing to pay for.
Sounds like a very sound business model .... as long as “other people’s money” holds out.