Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Helicondelta
Chemical weapons are not weapons of mass destruction.

Of course they are.

Just about every country in the world has them.

But liberals won't admit that Saddam had them, even AFTER admitting that Syria has them and has used them, then a report the other day that even ISIS has them. Still, no apology from liberals.

46 posted on 02/14/2016 6:38:30 AM PST by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: libertylover

Don’t know why chemical weapons would not be considered WMD. We also know that before we went into Iraq,the powers that be had time to move a lot of stuff out of the country. As I recall,there were a lot of stories going around about that at the time.


58 posted on 02/14/2016 6:52:04 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson