He’s afraid of the questions true Conservatives might ask him.
He’s changed his mind just since last night at the debate.
Yeah, right. Or maybe he isn’t interested in kissing the butts of the Log Cabin Fags and Queers at CPAC this year.
[He’s afraid of the questions true Conservatives might ask him.]
All conservative candidates should take TRUMP’S lead and boycott C-PAC. The ‘open-door, big tent’ C-PAC no longer embraces GOD, FAMILY, & COUNTRY.
Log Cabin Republicans Accepted as CPAC Sponsor
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2016/02/18/log-cabin-republicans-accepted-as-cpac-sponsor-n2121224
Kasich, Rubio and Cruz are the true conservatives, eh??? Trump IS the true conservative...Anti American globalists are not conservative...Unfair traders are not conservatives...Jeb Bush is not a conservative...Those Pacs who support Jeb Bush are not conservative...Those same Pacs who have turned to Cruz are still not conservative...Conservatives don't stand there on a stage and stretch and twist the truth and lie about their opponents...
TED CRUZ: U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing, 5/21/13:
"And I'd like to make a final point to those advocacy groups that are very engaged in this issue and rightly concerned about addressing our immigration system and, in particular, about addressing the situation for the 11 million who are currently in the shadows. If this amendment is adopted to the current bill, the effect would be that those 11 million under this current bill would still be eligible for RPI status. They would still be eligible for legal status and indeed, under the terms of the bill, they would be eligible for LPR status as well so that they are out of the shadows, which the proponents of this bill repeatedly point to as their principal objective to provide a legal status for those who are here illegally to be out of the shadows. This amendment would allow that happen, but what it would do is remove the pathway to citizenship so that there are real consequences that respect the rule of law and that treat legal immigrants with the fairness and respect they deserve. And a second point to those advocacy groups that are so passionately engaged. In my view, if this committee rejects this amendment, and I think everyone here views it as quite likely this committee will choose to reject this amendment, in my view, that decision will make it much, much more likely that this entire bill will fail in the House of Representatives. I don't want immigration reform to fail. I want immigration reform to pass. And so I would urge people of good faith on both sides of the aisle, if the objective is to pass common sense immigration reform that secures the borders, that improves legal immigration, and AMNESTY: that allows those who are here illegally to come in out of the shadows.Then we should look for areas of bipartisan agreement and compromised to come together. And this amendment, I believe, if this amendment were to pass, the chances of this bill passing into law would increase dramatically."