To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oh, and for anyone who is quick to dismiss the scandal, what about reporter Drew Johnson confirming that the allegations for at least two of the women are accurate? He’s actually supposed to be anti-Trump as well. Then there’s the testimony of the sister-in-law too.
50 posted on
03/27/2016 1:31:06 AM PDT by
rissole
To: rissole
Oh, and for anyone who is quick to dismiss the scandal, what about reporter Drew Johnson confirming that the allegations for at least two of the women are accurate? He’s actually supposed to be anti-Trump as well. Then there’s the testimony of the sister-in-law too. Absolutely Right On Mark!
51 posted on
03/27/2016 1:34:56 AM PDT by
Mr Apple
To: rissole
Drew Johnson was fired by the Washington Times after he said he could confirm two of the women.
53 posted on
03/27/2016 1:40:29 AM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Liberal tolerance only extends to people they agree with.)
To: rissole
He’s actually supposed to be anti-Trump as well.Dig down into his Twitter feed and you'll see he is virulently anti-Trump. Not particularly witty or interesting dude.
135 posted on
03/27/2016 5:19:44 AM PDT by
Stentor
To: rissole
I didn’t think Johnson “verified” the story was true. He simply identified the two from photographs.
193 posted on
03/27/2016 11:37:59 AM PDT by
VerySadAmerican
(Cruz voters: Wake up! Trump is our only chance of stopping the gopE. If not now, never!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson