I think a lot of the reasoning was that the Charlotte law was basically opening the door for any businesses to be sued to death for somehow objecting to letting some dude in the ladies’ restrooms. Homo-fascist lawfare. Some creepy dude walks into the womens room, locker-room, etc (who says he ‘feels’ like he’s a gal), gets tossed by some business owner upon hearing screams of women, then turns around and sues the business and gets big payouts, while businessman goes broke.
So anyone that says NO LAWS were needed are obviously not just okay with preying pervs, but also the kind of persecution of businesses akin to the bakeries and wedding photographers. Every time someone says this is no big deal, they are siding with the damned bastards that have already turned this country into the sick, deviant cesspool it now already is.
That was my question. Was there an issue being addressed.
For the perv part - the NC law created the situation that a fully trans ‘man’ with a penis would be required to use the ladies room. The law didn’t actually resolve the so-called perv issue.
So when this trans ‘man’ with a penis is in the ladies room and gets kicked out then what? Lawsuit.
I don’t think they resolved anything and created a lot of problems for the state.