[marktwain]

The "Assault Weapon Ban" was never based on facts or logic. It was always a media created, emotion driven way to push infringements on the Second Amendment.

[RC one]

make no mistake, the dems don’t give a ____ about any opposition to their anti-second amendment agenda. If they have the power, it will happen and part of me wants to see what happens when they attempt to “come and take ‘em”.

[Smokin' Joe]

Americans haven’t been spending their hard-earned money on firearms, accessories, and ammunition to meekly surrender them to be picked over and destroyed.

[SkyPilot]

They are not, nor were they ever, "Assault Weapons." Those by definition are capable of automatic fire.

These are, and were, semi-autos that liberals thought looked "scary" - and they used these weapons as the proverbial nose of the camel under the tent in order to usher in even more unconstitutional 2nd amendment violations.

[V_TWIN]

“The chart is a little misleading”

From abc news?? NO, say it ain’t so. /s/

[BuffaloJack]

Liberals have historically always opposed private ownership of weapons. It’s because they fear the populace.

[ctdonath2]

Support is one thing. Compliance is another.

NY’s latest version of the ban requires grandfathered owners register.
The compliance rate is 4%.

Someone needs to ask Hillary how she will deal with 96% of otherwise law abiding citizens choosing instead to, thru no action on their part, become declared felons.

[Travis McGee]

[Flintlock]

Ya think we might need ‘em??

Me too.