I have always thought, not that I am a lawyer, that an immunity agreement or grant is conditioned on full testimony from a grantee. If he’s been granted immunity then he doesn’t get to hide behind the 5th. AFAIK. But that ain’t probative.
I believe you are correct but only in the case at hand. This is a separate matter brought by JW. Clinton’s lawyers have been hammering that point the entire time. Judge Sullivan is looking for the Red Herring.
Actually, its 2 cases.....
Pagliano got the immunity for ANOTHER deposition.
The judge in this case wants to see what those term are.
This is a civil case, not a government case.