Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto

She still would have to be charged with a crime (offence) and she simply is not (yet).


5 posted on 11/21/2016 9:23:50 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rjsimmon
No, she does not have to be charged.

Nixon wasn't charged. Jimmy Carter's draft dodgers mostly were not charged. Garland wasn't charged and neither were many former Confederates who received pardons/amnesties.

Thus, Ex Parte Garland notes that pardons "...may be exercised at any time after its [the crime's] commission, either before legal proceedings are taken..."

8 posted on 11/21/2016 9:36:27 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rjsimmon
She still would have to be charged with a crime (offence) and she simply is not (yet).
*********************************************************
Not really. Ford pardoned Nixon, and he hadn't been charged. Plus Judge Napalitano was on Fox Business, discussing this, and said that it was not necessary.
24 posted on 11/21/2016 10:18:28 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson