That set a precedent though, no?
Not that I have ANY IDEA how precedents work!!
It is absolutely a precedent. The judge in the Penn case took the election from a democrat who won and gave it to the Republican who lost. The judge threw out ever single absentee ballot ruling they were corrupted by a voter fraud scheme and get this “hacking” if I remember correctly.
I’ll see if I can find an article on it for ya.