[Jacquerie]

How then, as per the Declaration, are governments to go about securing unalienable rights?

[867V309]

How then, as per the Declaration, are governments to go about securing unalienable rights?

For many years we have carried the stupefying burden of the lying, propaganda media, fully supported by filthy, mendacious politicians. Together, they forged a nearly impenetrable wall of self-serving deceit. But the internet, and the internet alone, has pried a crack in that wall through places like Free Republic and others.

I believe divine intervention played a hand in giving us the blessing of the internet, and we are reaping the reward which is the light of truth. The battle's not won, but it sure has begun.

[Pelham]

The Declaration was an announcement to North American colonials at large, and to interested governments like France and Holland, that the people of British North America were seceding and declaring their independence.

The Declaration didn’t secure any rights. It’s verbiage regarding the origin of rights is to delegitimize any claim that rights originate from Kings and to serve as a justification for rebellion and secession.

Unlike the Declaration,the Bill of Rights did secure rights. And without it the Constitution never would have been ratified. The Anti-Federalists insisted upon it.

And as it was the fears of the Anti-Federalists came to pass anyway. A warning there about what documents can do I suppose.