Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/25/2017 7:19:49 AM PST by bananaman22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bananaman22

>Trump is not the first U.S. President to have promised energy independence.<

He may not be but I’ll bet he’s the first President to achieve it.

Retards.


2 posted on 01/25/2017 7:21:49 AM PST by x1stcav (Leftism is like rust: It corrodes 24 hours a day until eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

No kidding. These people are real morons


3 posted on 01/25/2017 7:23:35 AM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Richard Nixon is also the guy to suggest an EPA


4 posted on 01/25/2017 7:23:48 AM PST by Insigne123 (It is the soldier, not the community organizer, who gives us freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

More half-truths (half-truths=lie) from the Lying Left?

Nobody’s saying we don’t need OPEC oil CURRENTLY.

The point is we have opportunities in the FUTURE to become independent of OPEC oil if we take the right steps and allow full exploration, drilling, and pipelines.


5 posted on 01/25/2017 7:25:02 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Obama did his ever-loving best to make the US entirely dependent on foreign oil in order to keep the coffers of Arab OPEC nations full while driving the US economy to its knees.

Never again. This nation will be energy independent in the next eight years. Screw the globalists.


6 posted on 01/25/2017 7:25:28 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Charlie, here comes the deuce, and when you speak of me speak well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

We have enough coal in the ground to provide our energy need for the next century. Of course the left knows this so they worked to keep it in the ground.

Reasonable environmental concerns should be noted, but the extreme rules that all but kill the coal industry does nothing but harm us.

There is oil off the coast of California. Open up drilling. There have been oil wells in California since oil was first discovered. What is the harm in drilling more wells? The harm is only to our own economy.

So the first thing that needs to be to become more energy independent it to cut back on all these extreme environmental laws.

This may have a side benefit, cutting funding to terrorist organization.


8 posted on 01/25/2017 7:32:32 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

OPEC needs the US as a customer rather more than the US needs OPEC. Oil is for most purposes a fungible commodity.


9 posted on 01/25/2017 7:33:03 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22; All

Ignoring the fact the carter deliberately shut down working oil wells to create false shortage so’s we’d “need” OPEC


10 posted on 01/25/2017 7:37:52 AM PST by maine-iac7 (cHRISTIAN IS AS CHRISTIAN DOES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
A good part of the reason that we use Saudi oil is because the people we have elected have accepted massive amounts of Saudi lobby money.

An example is our, Washington State's, Patty Murray.

12 posted on 01/25/2017 7:58:54 AM PST by Parmy (II don't know how to past the images.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
According to the government, http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=727&t=6, the US imports just over 1 million barrels a day from Saudi Arabia.

Yesterday Trump green lighted the Keystone which will move about 650,000 BD of Canadian crude to US gulf coast refineries. That's 2/3 of what is imported from Saudi. Only another 300,000 BD and they are pushed out of the US market.

13 posted on 01/25/2017 8:18:11 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (My North America stops at the Rio Grande)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

This person must be bribed like all those politicians the arabs own around here and in europe.


15 posted on 01/25/2017 8:51:12 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

I’d LOVE to see derricks off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard.
Love, love, love it!


18 posted on 01/25/2017 9:13:45 AM PST by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Not even reading the entire article it is obvious this is a really stupid idiot basing his premise on a false narrative. ‘After forty years we are still not energy independent’. Duh! who has been controlling the energy policy or blocking energy policy for the past forty years? So he assumes that we are going to believe that since the Democrats have not succeeded in making us energy independent then it must be impossible. IDIOT. We are not fully exploiting all available energy resources such as nuclear, clean coal, natural gas, shale oil, etc.

OMG! I did not even list water, wind, or solar. such commentary would be a waste of time due to reliability, effectiveness, etc..

Why do we even listen to these guys?


21 posted on 01/25/2017 9:51:23 AM PST by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson