Posted on 01/26/2017 12:33:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
For the most part, tanks are at an evolutionary dead end from what joe-nobody me can see.
Small improvements will come but until a tank can levitate or a reliable beam/pulse main weapon comes along or maybe some revolutionary development in armor/powerplant design comes around, I don’t see much growth.
I think Abrams is a heck of piece of technology. What times I drove one playing NG was fun when up to speed.
Unfortunately we don’t have the 5 armored divisions that existed in the 1980s to put those ‘60 tanks a month’ into. They would just end up in a ‘tank bone yard.’ along with the tanks that were surplus after those 5 divisions were disbanded 20 years ago.
sad to agree with you 100%, very well said.
That bug is < ‘66
Using this system, we had minimal congressional interference and got what we wanted. The beast we built was fast, accurate, and very compact/light and passed all engineering and safety tests with flying colors.
I'd love to say that that system is now in the field but it isn't: it was stopped by the acquisition system that "didn't want a government design".
In past I have wondered if the US could create “economy car” flying drones. That is, a very simple aircraft with an engine, a fuel tank, and fly by wire controlled by an off-the-shelf computer with hardened data storage, so that if it was fried by an AESA radar, or the equivalent, it would continue to fly with its last to-target directions.
A “beer can” body over a low cost frame, with an off-the-shelf engine. The brain is modular and can be plugged in just before ramp launch. A simple weapon like a 500 to 1000 pound bomb. One use, expendable.
In concept it could be made for under $20,000 each.
A Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, after program cost of $66.7 billion, has a per unit flyaway cost of $150 million.
For the price of a single Raptor, you could build an *armada* of, let’s be conservative, five thousand of these drones. If properly directed and launched, say one thousand of these would be impossible to stop short of using an airburst nuclear munition. Over your own territory. Which creates its own problems.
While an advanced fighter aircraft could easily shoot down a dozen of these drones, that doesn’t matter. By the time it returned to its airbase, there would likely be no place left to land, much less refuel and rearm.
With each successive wave of drones, the enemy nation would be far less capable to defend itself. And *then* you send in the high performance and stealth aircraft to take out their hardened targets.
Oh, and flying tanks as well.
Dear SJ,
Yup, first new tank “in too long a time”, yes?
As to aircraft, MiG’s have always been the air superiority role, except for the -23. Sukhoi’s have always been ‘the other aircraft’, as was with us with McDoug air superiority, and Grumman/Northrop still pushing the -18 series. General Dynamics did make a good one with the -16. All the new ‘alien borrowed design’ aircraft just don’t get the raised eyebrow. The B-2, a redesigned XB-49. Fairchild, with their first jet, the -86, and their last jet, the A-10, are both superb at what they do.
Here’s something ‘loopy’. American pilots, no longer military flight personnel, buy old aircraft, restore them, and fly them at airshows and such. Seems innocent, right? Do they buy old American jet fighters to fly? NO!! They’re flying MIGS!!! Go to youtube and look up by aircraft.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.