Posted on 02/03/2017 11:45:29 AM PST by drewh
Fake news
Who here thinks Trump, the only candidate who held up a rainbow flag given to him by supporters at a rally, was going to roll back LGBTQ rights??
Who here thinks that Trump, who got a standing ovation at eh RNC convention for his support of support towards the LGBTQ community, and then thanked the audience “for cheering what I just said”, was going to roll back LGBTQ rights??
I sure didn’t.
I mean Milo Yiannopoulos is gay, but he’s OUR gay!!
.
Poisonous traitors!
.
me too, and getting to choose which genders goes into our own public bathrooms would be nice
Fake news Friday.
Well, Donald Trump (prior to becoming Candidate Trump) was registered as a democrat for many years and has supported many liberal candidates and positions. In fact, it wasn’t until 2009 that he registered as a Republican. I have cars that are older that that.
Does that mean that President Trump is going to govern as a liberal - no. Does it mean that I will be suspicious of any action or lack of action that seems to support the liberal agenda - yes.
Currently, I view the vast majority of his actions as positive. If he keeps it up, I will likely vote for him for his reelection should he decide to run. That is despite not voting for him in the last election because he sounded like another RINO who recently “saw the light”.
You keep finding these fake news gems.
its a talent on loan from GOD! :)
Why would I believe any press?
If he does not say much about queers and destroys the Johnson Amendment, I would say we won that round. I kind of like that he’s quiet on this issue - they are the most hysterical of all.
.
You’re ill-informed!
The “bathroom” issue has nothing whatsoever to do with homosexuals, and it is a massive hardship on small businesses.
One added bathroom can easily cost a small restaurant $100,000 to construct in an established commercial complex, and additionally increase their rents by $800 per month.
.
Good grief, a “leaked” draft EO about LGBT to stir up a kerfuffle, then scuttled.
This is about news that never happened. I guess that’s not “fake news.”
the important takeaway here is who is playing on our team. We didnt elect ‘i went to Jared’ into office...
While Ivanka and Jared may some sway with the President, it is by no means a veto power. To accommodate the expressed opinions of his daughter and son-in-law, the language will no doubt be muted, with generalities coached in terms of consideration and tolerant recognition of gains so far, but whatever point to which they have advanced, that is as far as it goes for the next several years, until such time as a more liberal regime wrests control of the levers of power in these United States. Like all other advisers and close confidants of the seat of high power, Ivanka and Jared shall pass from the scene some day, and so long as rabid liberals are kept from assuming the Oval Office again, those who follow will de-escalate the “inevitable” march to defining deviancy down even further.
America may yet be reborn as a representative republic, and old Ben Franklin would have once more a reason to smile.
All social experimentation and democrat lunacy should be removed from the military asap.
Mattis is right.
FAKE NEWS. Nothing Trump said in 18 months of campaigning indicated he would roll back this stuff.
Fake news to sow discord.
Bannon does not have to “go around Jared”
I agree. Better strategy is to focus on things which will do long-term damage to the Left, like getting a conservative on the Supreme Court, rather than things which will further mobilize the Left's base against us. It's best, right now, to focus on those things which will damage the Left's elites, while not exciting their troops.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.