Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Winchester Proto-M14 Rifle
Am Shooting Journal ^ | 2/7/2017 | J Hines

Posted on 02/07/2017 11:26:27 AM PST by w1n1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: MileHi

Thank you, Buddy!


41 posted on 02/07/2017 6:53:30 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

I’m torn. I have a very early National Match M1A, (serial number under 25,000) that I’ve had for years. All TRW parts, the works. But it weighs a ton.

It’s topped with an original SA Gen 2 range finder scope, glass bedded in a tiger birch stock. If I could get the right price I’d sell it and get an FN.

If you know anyone....

Best,

L


42 posted on 02/07/2017 7:51:17 PM PST by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Lurker, are you a Tennessean?


43 posted on 02/07/2017 7:54:29 PM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: meyer

No, I’m in Illinois.

Why do you ask?

L


44 posted on 02/07/2017 7:56:01 PM PST by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

And the rifle was too light to make a useful club.


45 posted on 02/07/2017 8:58:17 PM PST by 43north (In the end, only kindness matters - except for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 43north

I actually saw a Marine shatter an M16 stock by hitting a VC in the head with it.


46 posted on 02/08/2017 3:32:14 AM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Good advice. Thanks. I’ve owned firearms since I was young but still have a lot to learn.


47 posted on 02/08/2017 7:02:28 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The future doesn't belong to the fainthearted. It belongs to the brave. - - Ronaldus Magnus Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Frederick303

I believe they had the right powder but somebody decided they could save money by using a different one....oh well.


48 posted on 02/15/2017 3:11:19 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail
agreed the m14 functioned well; but the stock tended to warp due to the humidity; and the attempt to switch to a composite stock did not work as the new stock changed the balance of the weapon.
49 posted on 02/27/2017 4:17:30 PM PST by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: quadrant
Wow - where'd that come from? I carried a wood stocked M-14 for 17 months in combat - including fording rivers, monsoon rains and at least one typhoon and warping was never an issue. My rifle always hit what I aimed at; that's why I kept it.

I never heard anybody complain about "warping" with either the birch or the walnut stock.

I never wanted or carried the fiberglass stock because it was a heavy pig. The government only went to fiberglass to save money because hardwood was getting too expensive to find and maintain.

50 posted on 02/27/2017 4:31:48 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail
Me, circa 1966 with my M-14, serial number 188366. Just back from a security patrol and a half hour firefight. My last magazine is in the weapon.


51 posted on 02/27/2017 5:01:57 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail
my reports come from two Army infantry officers, both of whom served two tours in S Vietnam.
52 posted on 02/28/2017 5:01:30 PM PST by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: quadrant

I don’t mean to imply anything negative about the reports you have gotten from those gentlemen but those of us who actually carried and used them never saw a warped stock.

I think that you need to research further. We habitually used linseed oil in thin layers over the life of our rifles. Waterproofed the wood quite effectively. I can’t imagine that the army didn’t do the same. The wood from the wrist back was too thick to warp and the wood surrounding the receiver had steel reinforcement. From the receiver forward to the stock ferrule was thick and U-shaped for rigidity. Where exactly were the warps supposed to occur?

My life literally depended on that rifle at it never failed any of us - it also never failed to drop whoever we shot, first try.


53 posted on 02/28/2017 7:16:24 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail
I never carried the M-14, except in boot camp. I found it a fine weapon that would fire under almost any circumstances.
But I do have great faith in the opinions (and experiences) of my friends. If you say that the use of linseed oil would reduce the tendency to warp, I accept your recommendation as truth. But I also know that neither Pat (who served in the 9th Infantry Division) nor Tony (who served in the 25th) would not make such a statement unless they believed it to be true. Neither has any need to lie or misstate after all these years. Pat did say that M-14 would have been a fine rifle for Korea or the Fulda Gap, but not for the heat, humidity, and muck of the Mekong Delta.
54 posted on 03/01/2017 11:17:23 AM PST by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: quadrant
I would love to talk to Pat and Tony (mainly because I just enjoy talking to fellow vets) but I guess I'd ask them "what wood stock warping problems did we have with M-1s? M-1 Carbines? Springfield '03s and Krags and Lee-Navy's and M1884s?"

The M-14 stock wasn't in any way different from those rifles as far as thickness or material or shape goes - and they all were used in hot, humid environments.

I think that some of our guys have to think up problems with the M-14 to explain or justify the mess that was the M-16.

The '14 was reliable, accurate and extremely effective. It was longer and heavier than later rifles and if you had the thing slung when you entered a GP tent, the bayonet lug would always catch on the cable above the entry and it'd yank you off your feet ("carrier qualifications")- but if your life depended on having a rifle that killed effectively at 10 meters to 500 meters and always fired when you wanted it to, that was the rifle to have.

55 posted on 03/01/2017 12:48:19 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson