Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: w1n1

If the tests hadn’t been rigged against it, we could have fielded the world-proven FN-FAL instead.


7 posted on 02/07/2017 11:55:07 AM PST by M1903A1 ("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: M1903A1

I really like my FAL, but the iron sights are vastly inferior to the Garand/M-14.


13 posted on 02/07/2017 12:15:09 PM PST by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: M1903A1
"If the tests hadn’t been rigged against it, we could have fielded the world-proven FN-FAL instead."

Says you! The FAL's dandy and reasonably accurate but it's longer and heavier than the M-14. I carried an L1A1 version of the FAL for one day when were working with Australian troops in I Corps. It wasn't as pointable as the M-14 and not any more controllable in full auto and the sights were lousy.

I was happy to have my M-14 back and the Aussie was sad to let it go.

22 posted on 02/07/2017 1:13:29 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson