Posted on 03/27/2017 8:35:48 AM PDT by OneVike
God said back when He handed down His law to send these freaks back to Him. Course modern man has decided they know better than the Creator, and turn over to the shrink community to explain the depraved minds of evil souls..
haul him out to the brick wall shoot him and send the bill for the spent bullet to his parents or wife.
= = = = = =
Far to humanitarian.
Needs to be taken to the wall, strung up and let the citizenry use his as a pinata.
When he gets hungry, start feeding him his tallywacker, slicing it off a nibble at a time with a dullish blade.
Typical of these evil, sick @%$#s to blame the victim for what they did. May he burn in hell.
Get out of here with the pizza stuff. My quibble is with his handling of Scripture, not his point.
The verse is not universal, it’s clearly about children in Christ (elect children). Of course his point is valid and correct, but that particular verse isn’t about all children, it’s about believing children (”little ones who believe in me”). It’s not about Muslim children or Sikh children or Mormon children, it’s about children in Christ. Of course the Lord would condemn abuse of those children, too, but that’s not what that verse is about. There are plenty of other passages that would properly support the point without the use of eisegesis.
That’s textbook eisegesis. That’s my only argument.
I wholeheartedly support your conclusion. I was the attorney for a child abuse victim in a particularly aggregious case back in the 90’s. I loathe molesters and believe the death penalty should be in play in certain instances because what was done to my client was unspeakable. That case led to a few more. I later did some work with SNAP to expose molesting clergy.
And?
I’ll repeat what I said above. “My quibble is with his handling of Scripture, not his point. The verse is not universal, it’s clearly about children in Christ (elect children). Of course his point is valid and correct, but that particular verse isn’t about all children, it’s about believing children (”little ones who believe in me”). There are plenty of other passages that would properly support the point without the use of eisegesis.”
It could have happened. When we were training to be foster parents, one discussion was about being careful around children who were sexually abused because they would initiate inappropriate actions. It sounds like the little girl had either been groomed or previously abused. (If the rapist was telling the truth about the initial encounter.)
And depending on the appearance of the woman, declaring her “not guilty”.
We’re cool. I Understood your beef, and I agree.
As I said, I used only half the verse to get my point across. Not to make a theological point.
I used the ignorance of many over the Scriptures to drive my point home to them. It worked.
Maybe I’ll write a theological article stating your point as to whom this and the ones before and after it were directed at.
I’m sorry. I was too critical.
I can agree to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.