Posted on 04/19/2017 8:19:13 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
First they ask, then they demand. Comply or be fined.
>“When we go to work, we should be valued for the contributions we make, and we should be able to do our jobs free from fear of deportations.”
Let’s add the danger of the risk of stink foot from you ignorant scum ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9FBQ1O5F8k
“They like it on the plantation: dancing, singing. They don’t want the law interfering.”
Californians are so anxious to keep their low-wage slaves.
Isn’t incitement to commit a crime a crime itself?
Oakland is becoming an ongoing criminal enterprise.
they already pigeoned holed the illegals as housekeepers.
“a resolution that asks cities based there”
I thought that Oakland was a city.
Oakland has cities based in Oakland?
What are they going to do when the Feds come knocking.
Or not knocking hopefully.
Typically... Libs ask private citizens to
break the law....
The reporter is pretty (in a 1940’s way) but perhaps not clear in her writing.
Sessions should send US Marshals to Oakland to arrest the city council members.
Sessions should send US Marshals to Oakland to arrest the city council members.
Every street, apartment complex etc should have its mandated "sanctuary area"
The resolution asks businesses to abide by the resolution, which “calls upon employers to establish sanctuary workplaces, where workers are respected and not threatened or discriminated against based on their immigration status.”
What happened to that article 3 of the constitution:
The Third Amendment (Amendment III) to the United States Constitution places restrictions on the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent.
Illegal aliens are essentially invaders...that is undocumented soldiers...and should be treated accordingly.
Not all Californians.
Think of the other federal prisoners that would have to share a cell with those stinky hippies.
A walleyed Irish lass.
These illegal sob’s took over California. Arrest these law breaking leeches.
so, is Oakland a sh*thole because it does stupid stuff like this, or does it do stupid stiff like this because it’s a sh*thole?
“Look, they’re bustin’ our balls about this sanctuary jit and we’d still like to provide it but .... well .... would YOU break the law FOR us? ... I mean, we’d really appreciate it and all, y’know?”
the voters put them there. blaming jackass politicians for being jackasses is a waste of time. the original problem is jackass voters.
not to mention the fact that I’m positive that would be brazenly unconstitutional. not to say the idea doesn’t have it s appeal despite that . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.