[oincobx]

While the Times did publish an article on May 11 describing the January 27 dinner in which Trump purportedly asked Comey for his loyalty, the Times cited officials who recalled Comey’s descriptions of the evening to them, not the memos themselves.

[Boardwalk]

Even if he asked for loyalty stfu, he deserves it! The Won had it!

[SSS Two]

While the Times did publish an article on May 11 describing the January 27 dinner in which Trump purportedly asked Comey for his loyalty, the Times cited officials who recalled Comey’s descriptions of the evening to them, not the memos themselves.

That's my understanding, too. OANN may have stepped in it with this article.

[FredZarguna]

The contents of the memos are not germane to the question of whether Comey made a false statement of a material fact under oath. He claimed he made the memos available because of an event that did not happen until after he had already made the leak.

[SoFloFreeper]

Perhaps, but the content of those memos was how Comey relayed the supposed events to his colleagues, right? Isn’t that what Comey said? He wrote the memos (supposedly) right after the meeting and shared that with friends.

Thus the memo contents are what the people in the May 11 piece were divulging.

Could that be it?