[afraidfortherepublic]

FTA:

She has an excellent case. The editorial was false and harmful. As for malice, the New York Times drips with malice toward Palin because she is a woman who opposes abortion on demand.

Less than two months later, the libelous editorial writer has to testify under oath.

Delicious karma!

[MHGinTN]

I want Sarah Palin to own the NY Slimes ... literally. She would melt the filth (like pouring water on the wicked witch) by insisting on truth in reporting.

[Paladin2]

Drill ‘em, Baby, Drill ‘em.

[Sasparilla]

The New York Times is chocked full of actual malice to everything not lunatic liberal based. They keep the hatchet razor sharp.

[ptsal]

Good news.....good news indeed

[miserare]

Hope that Sarah wins big!$$$$$$$

[aquila48]

Next I’d like to see James D’Amore sue the crap out of Goolag.

[Parley Baer]

GO SARAH GO

[bigbob]

“With malice aforethought”

[Lopeover]

I hope she ends up owning them!

[Gay State Conservative]

If the trial takes place in NYC Governor Palin doesn't stand a chance regardless of how appropriate her accusations are.

[Albion Wilde]

Now over at Instapundit, Glenn Reynolds linked the Hinderaker piece -- and offered a quip: "TO BE FAIR, WHO REALLY BLAMES THEM? You Heard It Here First: NY Times Editors Deny Reading Their Own Newspaper. I mean, if they want to know what’s going on they can always read InstaPundit."

LOL!!

[Pollster1]

Nine years later, and Governor Palin is still amazingly beautiful.