VERY GOOD Analysis, thank you.
And to clarify: I have no doubt the incident happened. I also understand that theories are all over the place. I’m doing my best to stay away from all of them.
I am not a firearm expert. But knowing how ‘The Strip’ operates and my political experience, allow me to throw a couple more things out there I omitted only due to time:
In my adult life, I have never, EVER heard of a owner of multiple firearms such as the ones listed who had NEVER voted - unless they had a criminal record. In which case such ownership would be illegal. Yet, I’m being told the accused has no criminal or voting record. Sorry, not buying that.
Next is the ‘no online history’ report. You’re telling me a wealthy real-estate owner and gambler does NOT have an online history? In 2017? Really? Oh, but he can wire $100K to GF oversize (which BTW, throws up an immediate red flag with the feds, but that’s another matter).
And as you read the other comments, there other key Vegas-related questions that no one has an answer, yet making this information public should have no bearing on the investigation. However, providing these answers would better explain with a gambler visiting from 80 miles away was actually doing days before this event.
Remember, asking unanswered questions does not make one a ‘conspiracy theorist’.
“Remember, asking unanswered questions does not make one a ‘conspiracy theorist’.”
True, and getting the response of “why don’t you wait until the investigation is completed, the facts as known are presented before asking questions that no one has the answer to and then getting hot under the collar because no one’s answering your questions?” SHOULD be enough to calm you down.