[lapsus calami]

 

 

People need to pay attention to this - this is bigger than Weinstein. This may be a chink in the armor that we've been looking for. It's a revelation of historic proportions that has been long overdue. It's been very interesting as to who has been vocal and how, who has remained silent. Saw an attorney last night talking about involvement by the DOJ and the distinct probability of RICO actions resulting. Civil suits would spill even more beans that will be picked over, creating even more leads. All this may, just may produce a long awaited silver bullet that unravels and takes down the corrupt entertainment/media/political axis.

 

 

[Political Junkie Too]

Saw an attorney last night talking about involvement by the DOJ and the distinct probability of RICO actions resulting.

Compare these three following cases:

With Weinstein, there are stories of payments made to hush up his molestations. These were supposedly all women of age, however he used his power and influence to threaten their livelihoods if they didn't comply. That is the classic hostile workplace harassment. If the payments were made by the company, that affects shareholders, but I think the Weinstein Company is a privately held business.

Michael Jackson was alleged to have made payments to hush up molestations of under-age boys. While it tarnished his reputation, he was still considered musical royalty.

Dennis Hastert was accused of molesting under-age boys many decades ago before he entered Congress. He made payments to hush up molestations, but he was arrested for "structuring" the payments to avoid financial reporting requirements, and was eventually sent to prison.

One of these is not like the other two. Care to guess which one and why?

-PJ