[SubMareener]

Hanity has confirmed that Jeff Sessions has not recused himself from Uranium 1. If it is an ethical investigation, we won’t know about it until the indictments.

[House Atreides]

Huh... regarding the Uranium 1 investigation...you can’t recuse yourself from a non-existent investigation.

I’ll give Sessions credit when it’s publicly announced that there is such an investigation and/or special counsel and that he (Sessions) is actively having the investigators REPORT AND BE RESPONSIBLE TO HIM.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, IT’S TEN MONTHS & COUNTING. And NOTHING!!

[FreeReign]

Hanity has confirmed that Jeff Sessions has not recused himself from Uranium 1. If it is an ethical investigation, we won’t know about it until the indictments.

Hannity's source was left unnamed.

What we do have confirmed, on the Senate record, at the confirmation hearings, under oath, under penalty of perjury, is Senator Sessions recusing himself on Hillary, the Clinton Foundation, and anything (Uranium One) connected to it.

GRASSLEY: During the course of the presidential campaign, you made a number of statements about the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, relating to her handling of sensitive e- mails and regarding certain actions of the Clinton Foundation. You weren't alone in that criticism. I was certainly critical in the same way as were millions of Americans on those matters, but now, you've been nominated to serve as attorney general. In light of those comments that you made, some have expressed concerns about whether you can approach the Clinton matter impartially in both fact and appearance. How do you plan to address those concerns?

SESSIONS: Mr. Chairman, it was a highly contentious campaign. I, like a lot of people, made comments about the issues in that campaign. With regard to Secretary Clinton and some of the comments I made, I do believe that that could place me objectivity in question. I've given that thought. I believe the proper thing for me to do, would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and that were raised during the campaign or to be otherwise connected to it.

GRASSLEY: OK. I think, that's -- let me emphasize then with a follow up question. To be very clear, you intend to recuse yourself from both the Clinton e-mail investigation and any matters involving the Clinton Foundation, if there are any?

SESSIONS: Yes.

Hearing Transcript Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on the Nomination of Sen. Sessions to be Attorney General

[wardaddy]

Tks

Then let’s wait

[Kalamata]

Who to believe? My Representative, Rep. Matt Gaetz, is a stand up guy. I trust HIM.

He “told Breitbart News on Wednesday that he and other House Judiciary Committee Republicans had met with Sessions at the Justice Department on September 28 in advance of an upcoming committee hearing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein later this month.

Gaetz said that when he asked Sessions to appoint a special counsel to investigate the 2010 Uranium One deal and Fusion GPS, the attorney general stood up, said he could not discuss the matter because he had recused himself, and walked out of the room, leaving them with a group of Rosenstein staffers “who showed no interest.”

“He said that anything that had to do with 2016 election, or Russia, or the candidates in the 2016 election, fell under the scope of his recusal, and he left the room,” Gaetz said.

“It was Sessions’ position that his recusal on the Russia matter divorced him from any oversight on Uranium One and Fusion GPS. That’s troubling. Sessions’ recusal is a function of his involvement in the Trump campaign. In no world does that impact his judgment as it relates to Fusion GPS and Uranium One. But he views the recusal more broadly. That’s troubling because that puts Rosenstein in charge,” he said.

http://truthfeednews.com/breaking-report-sessions-recuses-himself-from-uranium-one-scandal/