Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BinaryBoy

How do you prove a negative? I don’t see how he could win in a court of law—even if he proved it was a forgery. The yearbook doesn’t “prove” sexual assault so I don’t see how it would “disprove” it either.


4 posted on 12/13/2017 12:45:33 PM PST by davandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: davandbar

He doesn’t need to prove a negative. He’s already innocent. It’s about holding people accountable for slander and forgery.


13 posted on 12/13/2017 1:19:52 PM PST by ArcadeQuarters ("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: davandbar

It proves that fraud was used to further the credibility of the claim. That fraud can than be used to prove the other allegation is also a fraud and the onus is hers to prove otherwise. But at that point she is an admitted liar.


16 posted on 12/13/2017 1:31:03 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: davandbar; TigerClaws
How do you prove a negative? I don’t see how he could win in a court of law—even if he proved it was a forgery. The yearbook doesn’t “prove” sexual assault so I don’t see how it would “disprove” it either.
In the sense that a document which is altered after being signed is a forgery, we know that it’s forged. If I’m anywhere near correct in my understanding, the whole thing about two different kinds of ink having been admitted to as showing the division between what was written first, putatively in 1977, “Moore” was written later by the complaining woman - and that falls under any definition of “forgery.”

And, IMHO the jury is definitely still open on whether it was written by anyone named “Roy” or by someone named “Ray.” Altho I initially was dismissive of that theory, TigerClaws has me convinced. For not only is it true that it is not difficult to read the cursive written name either way, it would be just as easy to see the handwritten word “say” as “soy” if “say” did not make sense, and “soy” did.

And the kicker is that when you read the last word of the first line as “say,” and the signature as “Roy,” does the inscription as a whole actually make sense??? It reads clunky. But if you read the signature as “Ray,” suddenly the inscription, including the signature, is a rhyme. And coincidentally, the complainant had a classmate named Ray! I would sure like a handwriting analyst to see Ray’s inscriptions in other classmates’ yearbooks!

So, what do we have???? A published account that then-assistant DA Moore hit on a “child.” It does not matter that what was alleged would have been legal, it was hyped as “creepy." It is based on one woman’s word, of a putative memory from 40 years ago (itself inherently dubious), and buttressed by an unquestionably forged document. Oh, BTW, also buttressed by the one thing that really mattered - Moore’s side of the issue was stonewalled by all of the MSM. That’s “the dog that didn’t bark” in this case.

It was an anti-Moore propaganda campaign which is part of a pattern of anti-Republican - actually anti-mainstream American society - campaigns. Including the campaign which got “white hispanic” George Zimmerman put on trial for murder. And the white boys on the Duke Lacrosse team subjected to a hoax rape charge. Fundamentally these are “Man Bites Dog” stories because they allege that perpetration of evil by the demographic upon which society most depends - white men.

And the campaign gets most vociferous against conservative women (Palin) or blacks (Cain) precisely because such people cannot be allowed to exert their identity as cred to undermine the “white man him bad” narrative.


24 posted on 12/14/2017 5:37:16 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: davandbar
Don't for one second think that Judy Roy Moore lost that election !
Can't you see DemocRAT generated FAKE VOTES right in front of you ?

The information in the article Vote Fraud of Alabama from TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2017, deserves saving.


27 posted on 12/14/2017 6:00:58 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson