Disparity of force is a well established concept in law.
1 posted on
01/10/2018 7:26:07 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Two sets of @$$hole$ in unnecessary conflict.
2 posted on
01/10/2018 7:30:05 AM PST by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: marktwain
Words are not considered sufficient justification for the use of force, unless they are accompanied by actions that a reasonable person would perceive as a physical threat. Then why is this not true in the case of incitement to riot?
3 posted on
01/10/2018 7:33:55 AM PST by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: marktwain
It may also be a defense if the statement about their mother was true.
6 posted on
01/10/2018 7:47:27 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: marktwain
“no charges where brought against the occupants of the truck.”
They escalated it and picked up a deadly weapon. Why weren’t they charged?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson