Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: davikkm
>> the issue of the DREAMERs, the DACA recipients,

Since the author doesn't seem to know that these are two different things, I'll decline to read the rest of his article...

3 posted on 02/26/2018 2:02:52 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NewJerseyJoe
"Since the author doesn't seem to know that [Dreamers and DACA recipients] are two different things, I'll decline to read the rest of his article..."

He's a moron in more ways than one. The SCOTUS did not decide against the President, they just decided to not proceed with an emergency review, skipping the Appeals Courts. Meaning, they were either too busy or didn't consider it to be a true emergency.

A modest setback, yes, but not a loss. If Trump began deporting them anyway, daring the courts to try and stop, then it would become an emergency and the SCOTUS might then review it.

12 posted on 02/26/2018 2:18:16 PM PST by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson