Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Teigen replied, “Didn’t you morons get your panties in a wad defending the baker that didn’t want to make cakes for gay couples?”


What an idiot limousine libtard! How any more immature and irrational this woman could be?
The gay couple sued the baker to bankruptcy, that’s why we defended the baker (BTW, the baker did make cakes for gay coupleS, saying “he didn’t want to” is a blatant lie, but hey, what do you expect from the lying left).
There is no equivalency possible with Sarah Sanders who didn’t sue anyone and who didn’t even talked first about the Red Hen before a Red Hen’s employee himself publicly denounced how the restaurant’s owner mistreated Sarah.

What’s the h.ll is wrong with these people, why are they constantly lying?


12 posted on 07/01/2018 2:29:22 AM PDT by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: miniTAX

The more important point is that the baker does make cakes for gay couples all the time. He does not discriminate against anyone and makes that very clear. What he doesn’t do is make wedding cakes for them due to his religious convictions. The court upheld this was OK.

I personally feel that any establishment has the right to refuse service to anyone and in a sane world both the Cake Baker and the Red Hen can deny service if they choose to do so. If three dudes from the KKK wanted a drink at a local PUB, would anyone be upset if they’d were denied? Of course not.

With all that said, when word gets out that your establishment denies services to certain groups, this may have an economic impact. This should be considered when deciding who to deny. The Red Hen obviously felt it was worth the upheaval to show Sarah Sanders the door. Fair enough. Now they have become ground zero in a political poop-storm instead of a trendy restraunt in Lexington. Good job!!!.

As for Trump separating families at the border, its just a continuation of a policy Obama also carried out. Is it wise policy? Probably not, but either is 3-5 year waiting time for amnesty trials which the illegal alien is both sure to not show up to and also sure to lose. If congress doesn’t address this problem with real reform, the next step will be for the Feds to build tent cities on military bases to house illegal immigrant families while they await trial and to start construction of a wall to prevent them from illegally entering in the first place. I would personally rather see real reform enacted by Congress, but the tent cities and wall seem to be our best option at the moment.

And so it has been said......


14 posted on 07/01/2018 4:41:09 AM PDT by Mustangman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson