Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: w1n1
MP-380: .380, Capacity: 8+1, Overall Length: 6.7", Weight: 18.5 oz / 524.5g

Glock 26: 9mm, Capacity: 10 + 1, Length (Overall) 6.42 inch, Weight without magazine 550 g | 19.40 oz

Why go .380, when you can get 9mm in a smaller package?

14 posted on 09/06/2018 6:41:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It rubs the rainbow on it's skin or it gets the diversity again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
Why go .380, when you can get 9mm in a smaller package?

You missed this from the article:

"The “gun snobs” may look down their noses at the EZ, but those of us trying to teach beginners, women and senior citizens are rejoicing. Just the fact that a gun manufacturer is paying precise attention to this segment’s wants and needs is wonderful – that the gun actually performs as promised is even more significant. A few of the EZ’s notable achievements include a genuinely easy-to-rack slide, a crisp, comfortable trigger pull, a price south of $400, recoil rivaling that of a .22 mag firearm, an easy-to-load magazine featuring a load assist button like you might see on a .22 LR such as the Ruger SR 22 or the Walther P22, and the added assurance (for those who still need it) of an optional ambidextrous manual safety. It’s like Smith & Wesson actually talked to firearms salespeople and instructors before designing this piece – revolutionary!"

Not everybody is a tactical operator like you.

For what it's worth, Ruger did this first with their LC380, which is the larger LC9 frame and slide, with a lighter recoil spring and chambered in .380ACP, with a very easy to rack slide.

I own and carry a G26, so I'm a snob as well, but my latest purchase was a Ruger LCP for pocket carry. Much smaller than the S&W Shield 380 EZ or the Ruger LC9/LC380, and smaller even than my wife's G42.

17 posted on 09/06/2018 6:56:17 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

It also seems large for its type. Compare Beretta Pico @ 5.1” & 11.5oz.

Not vs. 9mm as this is not an “or” question but an “ and” one :)


19 posted on 09/06/2018 7:00:49 AM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

The mid sized 9s and 380s work very well for older/less strong folks.

Too many, gals especially, get a mini-380 and hate them- sure they fit under ladies clothes or disappear into the abyss of the purse well, but shootable ( blast, recoil and just too small to hold well) they are not for most.

I went with a G27 long ago- 9+1 of 40 cal in a 20 oz package for rough EDC, it is now an ugly worn and nicked thing of (relative) beauty.


32 posted on 09/08/2018 5:26:54 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson