Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump questions why Kavanaugh accuser didn't call the FBI after alleged assault
CNN Politics ^ | September 20, 2018 | Kate Sullivan and Brian Ries

Posted on 09/21/2018 12:16:13 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

How’s this even within the jurisdiction of the FBI?? It would be a state deal...and I wouldn’t be surprised if the statue of limitations isn’t expired.

This entire BS is nothing more than that...BS.

Funny how the Moore/Alabama election “sex charges” have disappeared since the election is long gone.

DemonRats are evil, seditious, lying traitors.


41 posted on 09/21/2018 3:47:55 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

This is Russian spy (fake news?) version of events:

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2659.htm

I’d like to know more about her father.


42 posted on 09/21/2018 3:58:22 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galatians328

POTUS’s comments were just fine. BK had been very properly vetted, multiple times.

This is all a concocted shim sham slam sabotaging lie of the left.

The ‘meat for the base’ was fashioned out of thin air by conspiring liars.

If you face the same accusation; quit your job and divorce your spouse, right?


43 posted on 09/21/2018 4:41:00 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
If you think that a different, new candidate for Supreme Court Justice wouldn't result in even more unsubstantiated jokes of an accusation, then I have a bridge to sell you

Of course they will, just like they tried to smear Gorsuch with similar sleaze. Most people didn't know or hear about them because in politics all that matters if something is credible not if it's actually true.

The smears against Gorsuch didn't stick because he had a clean image. As the Gorsuch nomination proved, there is no shortage of clean christian conservative judges. The smears against Kavanaugh are getting traction because of his own oblique allusions to his party boy past and other screwups

Grassley should call the vote early next week and get this resolved the next phase or Trump should pull the nomination. The longer this sits the more dirt the liberal media will sling real or otherwise, and the worse his chances get.

44 posted on 09/21/2018 4:48:56 AM PDT by Galatians328
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Is this a great country or what? Only in American can you be a drunk teenage ho and in your later years cash in when someone you knew gets famous. Boom, almost a 1/4 mil in 24 hours. Not to mention the book deal she has coming I’m sure. They always get a book deal then go on the view or Ellen to cry to the ladies on daytime TV, sell a few books and die a lonely death as a drunk washed up ho. No guy in his right mind will ever touch her again.


45 posted on 09/21/2018 5:05:47 AM PDT by freedomlver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Galatians328

If the name is pulled at this time, you won’t see another judge confirmed to SCOTUS during Trump’s term/s. There are plenty more accusers out there to malign the other judges. And being a woman won’t help during the SCOTUS confirmation hearings as the goal is to keep ANY conservative judge from making it to SCOTUS. If the Dems win this battle then we’ve just allowed them to set the plan for the entire War against the Western Justice System.


46 posted on 09/21/2018 5:15:16 AM PDT by Notthereyet (Notthereyet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Galatians328

Joined August 2018

Who are you trying to kid here ?


47 posted on 09/21/2018 5:21:30 AM PDT by ncalburt (Gop DC Globalists out themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
That's my question, too.

Why would she call the FBI? It wouldn't be a matter for the federal authorities but for the local police...which she didn't call either.

48 posted on 09/21/2018 5:23:35 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I thought that police complaint issues involving MINORS (high school students) were strictly CONFIDENTIAL with no disclosure to the public without COURT approval?


49 posted on 09/21/2018 5:32:34 AM PDT by leprechaun9 ( bou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Everything she and the RATS did were scheming to derail this nomination.

STARTING back when she sent the letters, hired a lawyer and get a polygraph set up.


50 posted on 09/21/2018 5:44:38 AM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51

And scrubbed her social media profiles purged the year book etc


51 posted on 09/21/2018 5:47:31 AM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Big difference.

When the info. became known to the White house on Thomas it was not public knowledge.

The FBI just updated his background check, without the Public knowing about it...THEN the story leaked.

When that happened the Senate did exactly as they are trying to do know, Have a hearing.

The Accuser and her accomplices wants no part of it on Monday. They are pushing for Thursday to keep B. K. from being seated on the Bench for the Oct. 1 session.

If the rats wanted the same treatment as Anita Hill/FBI event, they should have brought the allegations to Grassley and the White house when they were made aware of it in JULY!


52 posted on 09/21/2018 5:49:39 AM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Their attempting an “intact dilation and extraction.”


53 posted on 09/21/2018 5:54:45 AM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AC86UT89

“Um... it’s not in the FBI’s jurisdiction and it wasn’t 35 years ago.”

I think President Trump is needling the dimoKKKRATS.


54 posted on 09/21/2018 7:37:10 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Simple, it wasn't a matter for the FBI. Why didn't she call local law enforcement and swear out a criminal complaint?

I believe the matter never happened based on all the current information we have. Dr Ford afterall, was a promiscuous tart as a teenager. Her credibility is extremely low in this matter.

55 posted on 09/21/2018 9:43:43 AM PDT by 41Thunder (It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper; 2ndDivisionVet; All

I believe that the FBI was already involved in doing vetting on this appointment, so this would be an extension of that vetting. A lot less reporting to police was done 30 or more years ago as women were usually slut shamed when they did. Of course, reporting is normally done to local police not FBI unless kidnapping is involved. Prior to 30 years ago I had one rape, one child molestation reported to my mother at age 7, and two attempted rapes. Only the actual rape was reported to police.


56 posted on 09/21/2018 1:03:48 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson