“Well she passed a polygraph test....
... The only evidence we have is that she isn’t intentionally lying...”
****************************
And you “know” this how? Because a lawyer working with her says so? What question(s) was/were on this purported examination (as specified by the “subject”) by a paid “expert”?
And you’ve now concluded that you have “evidence” to support her thought processes.
Please don’t construe this post as an attack on you — it’s not. I just don’t like to see any of us givin ANY credence to this Agendanista’s allegation.
We have no idea how many women were prepped for this accusation. Billions of dollars for the democrats are at stake. Everyone saw how many women came forward about DJT...how many were credible?
We know the internet was scrubbed, and that is a clear indication of theater, along with the last minute timing, precluding a proper vetting of the accuser. We are pretty certain the issue is Roe v Wade, which no one remembers the actual ruling anymore, and it is election season.
My hope is that the result is turns out the democratic base and turns off the independents.
But if this nominee does not get a vote...
DK