There is still one glaring problem with this whole story.From an embedded tweet within the article:
Carrie Severino
Final witness in alleged Ford/Kavanaugh incident weighs in for Kavanaugh. So every single one of Fords supposed witnesses all of them, including her female friend/classmate conclusively refute her account. It doesnt add up.If this is, in fact, the "final witness," then we still haven't found out whose house the party was at. How do high school teen-agers have a party at a house that none of them are related to?
There is still one more person out there who has not been named. That person must be the teen who lived at the house.
The WaPo had two motives to intentionally misreport the story, turning one boy into a girl.1. The optics of four boys and one girl at a party is very bad for the girl, especially if she's going to make a claim of sexual assault. They needed to balance the attendance to three boys and two girls to make it "dates" and a friend.
2. The boy who was turned into a girl has to be the teen who lives at the house. He likely invited three friends over, and one of them brought a girl he just met. The girl that the WaPo placed at the party denies being at a party with Kavanaugh. She wasn't there because the WaPo replaced the boy resident with a girl who knew Ford.
It seems credible to me that the WaPo is covering up the one piece of information that would unravel this whole plot, namely the person who lived at the house. Naming that person puts a location to the event, which then opens up the rest to specific questions.
The WaPo turned the boy into a girl to protect the scheme against Kavanaugh from unraveling with the only investigable fact.
-PJ
No, they simply chose to identify "xe" as a girl. It's an extension of gender identity theory, the corollary that a person's gender identity can be whatever the Left needs it to be.
..There is still one more person out there who has not been named. That person must be the teen who lived at the house...
chrissie ford? thats how she got there and got home..she was already there and didn’t leave ( except to run out of the house)../s
Maybe it IS Garrett!!
The accuser can't even prove there was a party even with her own witnesses.