[SaxxonWoods]

It may be a bump, but it’s not a stock. It’s an ammo wasting toy that one can make easily, or learn to Bump-fire without the item. It’s not a gun, or even a gun part.

Doing away with it does not infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.

Those who think it does so infringe can go to court and see if they get anywhere.

[old-ager]

The problems are:
- the political reversal of multiple soundly-based letters already issued
- the twisting and abuse of the written words of the law
- the taking of property without compensation.

[old-ager]

> ammo wasting toy that one can make easily

and become a felon.

that’s legal abuse.

[Romans Nine]

You are right it’s a ammo wasting “toy” but the government has no business regulating it, period.

It amazes me on a website called “Free Republic” how many times liberty and freedom has to be pointed out, explained or defended.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Court decided using that logic for reducing magazine size and making owners get rid of their property in NJ already.

[stylin19a]

sometimes pulling a small thread unravels the whole sweater.

take a tad here, then a little there and pretty soon, it’s all gone.

I think it has to be fought every second of every minute of every day, like the RATs are doing to Pres. Trump.

Let me ask....Where do you, SaxxonWoods draw the line ?

[familyop]

"It’s an ammo wasting toy..."

A little closer to the constitutional consideration, it is not well regulated.

Here's a hypothetical and yes, normally unthinkable situation. Our military forces are exhausted overseas in an existential fight for our country.

So millions of civilians have been training to defend against an invasion here, on U.S. soil. Any supervisor implementing bum stocks as being well regulated would be decreased and removed due to a lack of accuracy for most soldiers possessing such hindrances against survivability.

That's where it will most likely go in the courts. Bump stocks would be comparable to weapons that work better for soldiers who are not in prone positions (*buzzzzz* fail). Bump stocks would be like canteens full of beer or pop (not well regulated).

[mylife]

Suppressive fire is not a toy!

[JamesP81]

So you are OK with the president amending federal law without congress passing a bill? Do you prefer to be ruled by a king? Because that’s what you are asking for.

[FrEEBEAN]

So, in other words, you hate freedom. It may not infringe upon the man made 2nd amendment, but it infringes on people’s rights period. A right is that which does not harm another being. I, we, you harm no one by owning one therefor it doesn’t matter if it’s a toy or not, it’s our right to own one if we so choose.