Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Grant used what he had to maximum perfection. His 6 week overland campaign had heavy losses but not nearly as many as if the war had continued. Ultimately he saved lives. Those are the hard decisions a great general must make. And Lee had a higher percentage of casualties. When brilliant tactics were called for he used them. His Vicksburg campaign was the greatest tactical campaign of the war. His whole objective during the Overland campaign was to hold Lees army in place and act as the anvil to Sherman’s hammer. And it completely worked. In every instance he did what was necessary to win.


61 posted on 01/17/2019 10:53:05 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

The point here is that Grant had huge advantages over Lee. If the supporting structures were equal between them, Lee would have likely won.


64 posted on 01/17/2019 11:01:21 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson